Repealing the
estate tax has long been a dream of Republican lawmakers. This is a
40% tax on all assets exceeding $5.45 Million for an individual
decedent or twice that exemption for a couple. Those who want to
repeal it believe that our descendants are all entitled to the
fruits of our labor and to live at least as well as their forebears.
I share the ideal
that our descendants should enjoy a quality of life at least as good
as ours, which makes it crucial to abolish the other inheritance tax:
the quality of life taxed to future generations for every gallon of
fossil fuel burned.
Global warming as
a consequence of human activity has become an incontrovertible fact
of science. The cost to future generations is incalculable. Effects
include a rapidly increasing frequency of severe storms, floods,
droughts, and other natural disasters, the accelerating loss of the
polar ice caps accompanied by rising seas, acidification of the
oceans with an accompanying decimation of marine biodiversity, and
extinctions of species leading to a staggering loss of terrestrial
biodiversity. A huge unanswerable question is whether or not we would
be one of the surviving species.
Sweeping changes
to the landscape of our planet will likely include coastal flooding
and the reshaping of the boundaries of our land masses as well as
regional climate changes that will threaten the food and water
supplies of whole populations, leading to mass migrations and a
refugee crisis of unprecedented proportions. Aside from the inherent
suffering of these populations, such conditions become breeding
grounds for violent conflict and recruitment to radical causes.
Since the process
of global warming feeds itself, much has been said of the “tipping
point,” the moment in time at which the process becomes
irreversible and life on earth is eventually doomed. Some believe
that we have already crossed it. Others suggest that it is close at
hand. It is likely, in any case, that every year in which we
contribute to the problem matters. Even the next four years could
determine whether or not we step off the edge of the cliff.
It is time for
those we elect to public office to put aside their differences and
address the big problems that will shape the world to come. Ignoring
or denying these problems gambles the survival of our species.
Putting off the solutions in the interest of short-term gains may
deprive future generations of a chance to live. And that’s the
ultimate pro-life position.